It looks like there are 1900 forks on GitHub.

Same. This is the way.

• Owner profile only for installing and updating apps
• Primary/daily profile for pure FOSS apps
• Private space within the primary profile for Google services and any apps that require it

I believe I saw the same video. I’m now planning to switch from Ubuntu to Parrot OS.

Thanks. Since I’m just starting my privacy journey, I’m sticking with the mainstream options for now, but using an aliasing service will make it easy easy for me to switch in the future. I’ll check it Migadu and I appreciate the suggestion.

I switched from Google Authenticator to Ente Auth recently and am very, very happy. It works great.

I haven’t tried their other apps yet, though. I intend to take a look at their images app.

My answer to this is to use a custom domain with an email aliasing service.

I’ve gone through about half of the 400 accounts in my password manager and moved them over. I’ll migrate the rest over the next week or so.

So, I’m switching from Gmail to Proton for now, but if Proton starts to get worse or Tuta catches up on functionality or there’s a better provider that emerges or I decide to try to self-host, it’s one easy change at the alias provider to redirect all of my mail to a new email provider.

I like your logic here. Torrent index -> alternative platforms -> YT proper.

Assuming the torrent index becomes decentralized, there are really two categories where it makes sense to build this in:

1. The YouTube frontends, as you mention

2. The self-hosted downloaders that already exist, like Tube Archivist

I think the second category is where you get all the seeding traction. Sure, it would be great if the Android frontends also participate, but there are thousands of NAS devices that are already downloading YouTube videos for a single user. If there was an addon that allowed all of these users to share content automatically, I think there would be a lot of buy in / seeding.

deleted by creator

No. It’s for IPTV channels that already exist. It lets you organize them and then make them available in Plex or Jellyfin.

If you’re looking to make your own channel from content you already downloaded, that’s what ErsatzTV and dizqueTV do.

If you’re looking to stream torrents without downloading them first, I’m pretty sure that can be done with Streamio and plugins, but I haven’t tried it.

I’ve tried Dispatcharr and was pleased.

It will be, once there’s code to share. I made this a couple hours ago, and as the name implies, I intended to turn it into an interactive wiki that could be community maintained.

I don’t know how else to explain to you that it’s a static site. The “source”, as it currently exists, is being served to you as soon as you browse to the website.

How does this not relate to your question? Literally click “view source” in your browser or use the command that I already gave you. Feel free to download all of it. You have full access, right this moment.

I was just collecting resources for myself and thought it would be helpful to share for others and maybe turn it into a wiki that everyone could use.

It’s not a dynamic site. No code is being rendered on the server. It’s all static assets, pushed to a CDN.

You can download it all with the following command: wget -m -k -E -p -np https://theprivacywiki.com/

Yes, to organize some of it, and it’s a static site. So you can literally click “View Source” in your browser.

Exactly. We can just fork it, if the need ever arrives.

There’s no reason for is to suffer through a more clunky solution when this is all open source.

I share this concern.

I’m new at this, but the biggest reason I’m not going with Tuta is that I want encryption that is interoperable with other providers that offer encryption.

Thanks. Here’s a comparison, for anyone else who might be interested:

Feature matrix

Repos: AppVerifier · Verified Apps · AppVerifier BG. From each README as of June 2026; stars/releases change over time.

Thank you for sharing, but is this the third version of AppVerifier? I’m having a little trouble following all of them and their differences.

Jumping on the bandwagon here.

Yes, I intend to use my own domain name when I switch.

For IMAP, it looks like there are bridges for both Proton and Tuta that I can run locally.

https://gizmodo.com/tuta-email-denies-connection-to-intelligence-services-1851022465

And again, I’m not saying that I believe this. I have no idea what to think. My original point was that it’s all very confusing to beginners.