• minoscopede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The problem is supporting ad networks.

    Edit: /s because apparently it wasn’t obvious. Anonymous is obviously better.

    • OR3X@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Mozilla has to generate enough revenue to continue developing their products somehow. It would be nice if donations were enough to cover those development costs but that simply isn’t the case. Because of this the ad networks are a necessary “evil”.

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Supporting ad networks is not a ‘necessary’ evil. There are many not-for-profit organisations that do not use ads for revenue raising.

        • OR3X@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          What would you suggest then? They’ve been unable to sustain themselves via donations alone.

          • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            When writing my previous post I had started writing a list of suggested strategies; but I changed my mind about posting that. I’m not a member of Mozilla. I don’t know what particular challenges they face, and my expertise are not in not-for-profit fundraising. So although I do have ideas, I don’t really want to get into a trap of trying to defend my half-arse ideas against people picking them apart. It’s beside the point. The point is just that it is achievable, as evidenced by other organisations achieving it.

            I will say though that they could at least just mention on the Firefox ‘successful update’ page that Firefox is supported by donations, and give a link. A lot of people really like Firefox; and I think that if Firefox asked for donations, they would get more donations.