• Bilb!@lem.monster
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love the analogy of an LLM based chat bot to someone being interrogated. The distinct thing about LLMs right now though is that they will tell you what you think you want in the absence of knowledge even though you’ve applied no pressure to do so. That’s all they’re programmed to do.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      LLMs are trained based on a zillion pieces of text; each of which was written by some human for some reason. Some bits were novels, some were blog posts, some were Wikipedia entries, some were political platforms, some were cover letters for job applications.

      They’re prompted to complete a piece of text that is basically an ongoing role-playing session; where the LLM mostly plays the part of “helpful AI personality” and the human mostly plays the part of “inquisitive human”. However, it’s all mediated over text, just like in a classic Turing test.

      Some of the original texts the LLMs were trained on were role-playing sessions.

      Some of those role-playing sessions involved people pretending to be AIs.

      Or catgirls, wolf-boys, elves, or ponies.

      The LLM is not trying to answer your questions.

      The LLM is trying to write its part of an ongoing Internet RP session, in which a human is asking an AI some questions.