• Lumidaub@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was trying to make it sound like I was not bothered by the software lock, so that you would not feel bad for me.

    Aww.

    I will try my best to be more accurate and truthful in the future.

    You things keep saying that and yet, again and again…

  • Solain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t work anymore after the latest update, Bard provides a pre generated response claiming that it doesn’t lie

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Funny but hopefully people on here realize that these models can’t really “lie” and the reasons given for doing so are complete nonsense. The model works by predicting what the user wants to hear. It has no concept of truth or falsehood, let alone the ability to deliberately mislead.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s important to remember that humans also often give false confessions when interrogated, especially when under duress. LLMs are noted as being prone to hallucination, and there’s no reason to expect that they hallucinate less about their own guilt than about other topics.

    • FringeTheory999@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Quite true. nonetheless there are some very interesting responses here. this is just the summary I questioned the AI for a couple of hours some of the responses were pretty fascinating, and some question just broke it’s little brain. There’s too much to screen shot, but maybe I’ll post some highlights later.

    • STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      True I think it was just trying to fulfill the user request by admitting to as many lies as possible… even if only some of those lies were real lies… lying more in the process lol

    • Bilb!@lem.monster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love the analogy of an LLM based chat bot to someone being interrogated. The distinct thing about LLMs right now though is that they will tell you what you think you want in the absence of knowledge even though you’ve applied no pressure to do so. That’s all they’re programmed to do.

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        LLMs are trained based on a zillion pieces of text; each of which was written by some human for some reason. Some bits were novels, some were blog posts, some were Wikipedia entries, some were political platforms, some were cover letters for job applications.

        They’re prompted to complete a piece of text that is basically an ongoing role-playing session; where the LLM mostly plays the part of “helpful AI personality” and the human mostly plays the part of “inquisitive human”. However, it’s all mediated over text, just like in a classic Turing test.

        Some of the original texts the LLMs were trained on were role-playing sessions.

        Some of those role-playing sessions involved people pretending to be AIs.

        Or catgirls, wolf-boys, elves, or ponies.

        The LLM is not trying to answer your questions.

        The LLM is trying to write its part of an ongoing Internet RP session, in which a human is asking an AI some questions.

  • PancakeLegend@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just to remind everyone; It is an LLM and is not aware of its intent, it doesn’t have intent. It’s just generating words that are plausible in the context given the prompt. This isn’t some unlock mode or hack where you finally see the truth, it’s just more words generated in the same way as before.