College student put on academic probation for using Grammarly: ‘AI violation’::Marley Stevens, a junior at the University of North Georgia, says she was wrongly accused of cheating.

  • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve been at the front of the classroom–using tools like TurnItIn is fine for getting “red flags,” but I’d never rely on just tools to give someone a zero.

    First, unless you’re in a class with a hundred people, the professor would have a general idea as to whether you’re putting in effort–are they attentive? Do they ask questions? And an informal talk with the person would likely determine how well they understand the content in the paper. Even for people who can’t articulate well, there are questions you can ask that will give you a good feel for whether they wrote it.

    I’ve caught cheaters several times, it’s not that hard. Will a few slide through? Yes, but they will regardless of how many stupid AI tools you use. Give the students the benefit of the doubt and put in some effort, lazy profs.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      8 months ago

      My sister once got a zero because of a 100% match in the system with her own same work uploaded there a few minutes before. It was resolved, but - not very nice emotions.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’d have put a complaint in with the department for unprofessional conduct . If they can’t catch something that obvious, they aren’t even trying to run a class properly.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well, I told her something similar, but apparently everybody involved was immediately apologetic, so.

      • Unsmooth7439@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Same thing happened to me at the beginning of this semester. Thankfully it got resolved, but it’s not a good feeling to be accused of 100% plagiarism.

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 months ago

      Same, and discussed with my lecturers.

      Especially 1st year business - we use the same text book as the last 10 years (just different versions), where nothing has really changed in the last 30 odd years, using the same template that runs through 600 odd students a year, where nearly every student uses the same easy three references that we used in class.

      Its new to you, but no one is going to have an original idea or anything revolutionary in that assessment.

    • Railison@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Anyone marking an assignment with a TurnItIn report, who is also in possession of half a brain, knows to read through the report and check where the matches are coming from. A high similarity score can come about for many reasons, and in my experience most of those reasons are not due to cheating.

    • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve also been the one on the opposite side of the classroom. I was lab based, so we didn’t use Turn it in.

      With a reasonably sized class, you can easily spot which students have worked together because their reports tend to be shockingly similar.

      I agree that you get a feel for them with informal conversations and you can see how their submissions tie up with your informal conversations.

      I used to tweak the questions year on year. I’ve suspected there is a black market, an assignment exchange, or something because I caught students submitting work from previous years. They were mainly international students that were only there for their masters year.