• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    By this logic wage theft isn’t theft since the employee never had the money in their possession.

    Let’s exaggerate things. An indie dev sells a game for 5$ and when all things are split up they have 2$ going to them. They sell one copy but with the tracker they put into the game, they can tell that there’s a million person that have played it. Their income for the work they put in is 2$, a million -1 people got to enjoy what they created through piracy. So you’re telling me, no one has stolen anything from that creator?

    • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Wage theft is different from piracy. When you work for an employer, you are giving them hours of labour in exchange for the compensation, I have a limited amount of labour hours to use in my lifetime, whereas copying a work can be done an infinite amount of times without requiring an additional labour time to recreate it.

      I’m not saying that piracy is ethical, there are many cases where it is unethical, but it is not theft.

    • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      in wage theft, there is an agreement about getting paid, and the employer fraudulently does not pay that. I have no such agreement with ubisoft or blizzard.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ok, but you acquiring content through piracy also is fraud and also makes you acquire something someone worked for without compensating them when the agreement they had with society in general was that they would make their creation available in exchange for money.

        But hey, social contract, who needs that? 🤷

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            It is if the person sharing it isn’t the original creator, they do it in a way that makes it so you’re now in possession of the content and they do it without the creator’s approval.

            You guys are so good at mental gymnastics, you should use some of that energy to understand laws and to think about more than your self interest.