• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        So in that scenario we can produce infinite steaks, right?

        Now, people start stealing those steaks because we can produce an infinite amount of them, infinite supply = cost should be zero.

        Now, tell me… What’s the incentive for the steak producer to continue producing those steaks if people aren’t paying for them?

        See where I’m going with that?

        In the end of doesn’t matter if an infinite quantity can be produced “for free”, there’s people behind the product that pay the price and no matter how you want to justify it, if you don’t respect the way the creator wants to give access to their product to people, you have no moral ground to stand on.

        I’m not saying people don’t do it, I’m saying that trying to justify it to make you feel better about it is pure hypocrisy and just wrong.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s objectively untrue due to the case study of what’s actually happening in real life though. You CAN steal as many steaks as you want, and people ARE paying, at least for the good ones. Enough to fund giant companies that produce more steaks.

          if you don’t respect the way the creator wants to give access to their product to people, you have no moral ground to stand on.

          Sometimes the creator is wrong. Monopolies are wrong. Slave labor is wrong. Massive environmental externalities are wrong. In many cases, these things are not illegal, but they should be. Same goes for restrictions on purchases of digital media. It’s wrong, and we shouldn’t respect it. That’s the moral high ground.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            “Slave labor is wrong” says the guy who doesn’t want to pay for the labor of the people providing him with content.

            If you don’t agree with the way it’s distributed then skip it entirely, that’s the only way you’ve got the moral high ground.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              “Slave labor is wrong” says the guy who doesn’t want to pay for the labor of the people providing him with content.

              Are they providing me with content though? When that media inevitably becomes unusable due to their policies, do I get a refund? Historically, no.

              Which is, by the way, not legal, so producers have neither the moral nor the legal high ground if you think about it. They do have better lawyers though.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Are they providing me with content though?

                I don’t know what you’re pirating if it’s not content created by other people

                  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I don’t think you understand what I meant…

                    People create what you’re pirating, the games, music, movies that you’re illegally downloading have been created by people who need to make a living.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I am good friends with someone who works with detained criminals and thats not how most thievery happens. Besides alcohol (but addiction is a different story) baby food is the item most often stolen. Packages of sliced cheese are also common.

      The criminal poor don’t go to the store to steal specific items they go to buy food like normal and with every item they are counting if they will have enough on their account. When they get to their budget limit they try to swap some stuff to make It work. If that really doesn’t work they sometimes decide to take a more expansive items from their cart and smuggle it out without paying.

      Of course this wont be the exact scenario for all store-theft but its what i hear is most common at least where i live.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        What I’m saying is that there’s plenty of cheap games you can play, even tons of free ones (one a week on epic) if you don’t have enough money. It doesn’t make it morally right to pirate games.

        I know people do it, I do it too, trying to pass it as being somehow morally right is what I can’t accept. I’m at fault, I accept it and don’t try to make myself believe that it’s ok, it’s not.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I see where you are coming from.

          Doing something wrong and realizing it is wrong is a really important skill to have as its part of the guilt mechanisms which is important in a healthy society.

          I am going to settle on i agree on what you say here specifically but i disagree that there isn’t more to discuss within the same topic about what is and isn’t morally right. Which admittedly is something that would requires a much bigger body of people to weigh in on.

          Wishing you well!