"…I remember, like, them sending over a close-up of cellulite and being like, ‘Do you want us to touch this up?’ And I was like, ‘No. That’s an ass.’”
Gotta appreciate the honesty.
Now she has anew face. Disappointing she was head to toe gorgeous
Poor choice of words.
Said Ripley to the android Bishop.
no honey, you have to wait for the movie to come out
if you want Botox for your face to be on film why not Botox your ass too?
But she has photos in the fappening?
The hell kind of question even is that? She has had pictures stolen from her so she cant want to retain some control over showing her body further? Like what are even trying to say?
So, because her privacy has already been violated, now whomever wants to is entitled to see her naked?
Is this the insane point you’re trying to make, or am I missing something? I’ve been raped previously, so I want to protect myself if that means I’m now fair game for any random passersby.
Which traumatized her, btw. As it did the majority of women that had their private pictures stolen and distributed.
Now, I’m not hatin on you, we all gotta learn some things as we go. But, as others have already informed you, having one’s nude images available in one context doesn’t preclude objecting to ones nude images being used in another. More important, it absolutely isn’t the same as being naked with people around you, and you could be a porn star that consented to distribution of your performance and be perfectly valid in objecting to someone on set that isn’t necessary.
There’s a fundamental difference between images and ones body. There’s a fundamental difference between having a minimum number of non-intimate coworkers present during a nude scene and having random other crew present.
We are all allowed body autonomy. It is the fundamental right, the right that underpins almost all other rights. That autonomy includes having a choice in who does and doesn’t have access to seeing your body. That period right before this sentence is period, there’s no exceptions, only violation of ones right to preserve access to their body.
To use a hyperbolic comparison, what you said translates to “why? She was raped once, so she should be okay being groped now.” No, it isn’t the same thing 1:1, but it is very much a useful analogy. She essentially got violated years ago, and being violated isn’t going to make anyone less likely to object to further violation.
I’ll tell you a secret: she’s allowed to bar anyone she wants from seeing her body for any reason she wants. Even if they’ve seen pictures of it before.
Wtaf? Reevaluate your life.
Go back to Reddit, man, they like this type o shit over there
Exactly. Reddit started hating her after she was pissed about the leaks. She was their darling before then.
I don’t even think that had anything to do with it. They finally got to see her naked and didn’t need to see her as a person any more.
They never did in the first place.
If you’re genuinely confused, the difference is consent.
Do better.
