• HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Incorrect. The X-rays from old TVs came from the HV rectifier, in the back of the set.

        • antimidas@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Which is also exactly what the CRT itself is – not all of the electrons pass through the mask. The difference is, that the actual CRT part has a longer field to accelerate the electrons, meaning the hit the mask or cathode with a higher energy leading to higher power x-ray photons. Modern tubes just had shielding so it wasn’t a concern, the older ones didn’t.

          Technically x-rays are always generated when a particle accelerates. That’s why you can get them even from a high power cyclotron where the particle has a constant force applied on it. The actual CRT creates higher energy electrons and thus will generate more x-rays than the rectifier, it’s calculated simply from the voltage and the overall distance of acceleration. But if the TV had a tube rectifier it’s true that that would generate low power x-rays as well.

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Technically, every forward-biased rectifier emits EM of wavelength and intensity depending on materials.

            1N4007 silicon rectifier emits a few THz photons when forward biased.

            Use different materials and you have a LED, an inefficient rectifier but great light source.

            Tube rectifier with high enough voltage

            https://tubedata.jp/sheets/135/1/1DG3A.pdf