• OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I recommend this video which talks about bartering and how our simplistic view of bartering is quite innacurate to how things worked pre-money societies.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, Andrewism is great!

        If you are really interested in the topic, you should take the time to read “Debt, the first 5,000 years” by David Graeber. Totally worth it!

    • adderaline@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      people should not starve. we have the resources to ensure nobody starves. it isn’t a naive statement, its a moral imperative.

  • DingleBoone@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is like saying, “Why can’t we all just pretend counterfeit money is real?” Sure, it sounds like a nice simple solution until suddenly everyone prints counterfeit money and expects to buy things that no one is producing now that an easier option has appeared.

  • JVT038@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hmm, but why would a farmer provide food to people without getting anything in return? This is, assuming everyone is selfish, which is the core assumption of capitalism.

      • JVT038@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well I mean, most of the liberal and classical economists generally try to predict the behaviors of consumers, which lead to assumptions such as “People will generally be selfish”.

        • Platomus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because they’re put in an economic system where if they aren’t - they starve.