I already explained to you my position on the matter, that being that this is a terrible question because it’s completely arbitrary. I don’t take issue with levels of wealth, but relations of production and distribution that lead to inequality. The socialist market economy sacrificed some degree of inequality in favor of rapid and stable development, which worked, and is eroding the basis of this inequality over time.
I was just surprised that there’s no level of wealth where you’d go “okay that’s too much”, at least not in a way you are comfortable saying. Theoretically there is, but it’s just a feeling, not any sort of number
I already explained to you my position on the matter, that being that this is a terrible question because it’s completely arbitrary. I don’t take issue with levels of wealth, but relations of production and distribution that lead to inequality. The socialist market economy sacrificed some degree of inequality in favor of rapid and stable development, which worked, and is eroding the basis of this inequality over time.
Stop JAQing off.
I was just surprised that there’s no level of wealth where you’d go “okay that’s too much”, at least not in a way you are comfortable saying. Theoretically there is, but it’s just a feeling, not any sort of number