FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world · 1 month agoTruthpastelemmy.worldimagemessage-square113linkfedilinkarrow-up11.03Karrow-down13file-text
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1imageTruthpastelemmy.worldFlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square113linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareatomicorange@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoBut if butter can be produced in abundant habitat like the midwest prairie instead of threatened species-dense places like Borneo’s jungle, I’d prefer to go with the higher land use but ultimately less ecologically destructive option.
minus-squarenormis@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoSure, it’s an alternative. It’s also much much more expensive and less healthy than palm oil (butter has more saturated fats and cholesterol).
But if butter can be produced in abundant habitat like the midwest prairie instead of threatened species-dense places like Borneo’s jungle, I’d prefer to go with the higher land use but ultimately less ecologically destructive option.
Sure, it’s an alternative. It’s also much much more expensive and less healthy than palm oil (butter has more saturated fats and cholesterol).