How about ANY FINITE SEQUENCE AT ALL?

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      They should look up the classic example of rationals in the real numbers. Their statement could hardly be more wrong.

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          I most assuredly am talking about your false statement regarding density.

            • Urist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              14 days ago

              Weird to flex when you have nothing to show off. Let me show you how you do it, buddy: I am a mathematician. Infinity, density and cardinality of sets are not mysterious to me because I read a lot of books. If you read a few then you might discover your very cool comment above was actually not so cool and true.

                • Urist@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Damn, you really do suck more as a person than you do at math.

                  • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    Absolutely not, I try to guide people right and know nothing about it. It’s not a contest for best mathematician, it’s a comment thread on probability. So, density not relevant can we continue