• Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    PS: Has it occurred to you that I’m defending the workers that earn a living on the platform and are hurt by stealing?

    • davidagain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Has put occurred to you that young impressionable minds are hurt by you lying on the Internet that skipping ads is theft or that it hurts people?

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Well, it’s the truth. Ad-funded businesses (most creators) guess what, are hurt by blocking ads.

        • davidagain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Do you let the ads play in full, or do you press skip as sin as you can?

          Guess what, pressing skip means the advertiser isn’t charged and the content creator isn’t paid. Far more people press skip than get ad blockers. You should be criticising me for pressing skip, surely! Ad skippers hurt content creators far more!

          And IT IS NOT THEFT! None of it is stealing. The outright LIE is that skipping or blocking ads is theft.

          I actually don’t use an ad blocker, I just skip the ads, and I skip them guilt free, because the majority of content creators aren’t in Google’s more lucrative partner programs, so Google keeps most of the money, and if their content doesn’t qualify for monetisation, Google keeps all of the money from ads on their content.

          But I put an ad blocker on my elderly relative’s computer because those ads that you keep defending kept tricking her into installing malware, and it’s not even slightly illegal and it’s not even slightly morally questionable.