• fossphi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    7 days ago

    Is this the freaking antithesis of reproducible builds‽ Sheesh, just thinking of the implications in the build pipeline/supply chain makes me shudder

            • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              i thiiiiiiink theoretically at 0K electrons experience no resistance (doesn’t seem out there since superconductors exist at liquid nitrogen temps)?
              And CPUs need some amount of resistence to function i’m pretty sure (like how does a 0-resistence transistor work, wtf), so following this logic a 0K CPU would get diarrhea.

      • Finadil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Looking at the source they thankfully already use a temp of zero, but max tokens is 320. That doesn’t seem like much for code especially since most symbols are a whole token.

    • groet@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 days ago

      Just hash the binary and include it with the build. When somebody else compiles they can check the hash and just recompile until it is the same. Deterministic outcome in presumambly finite time. Untill the weights of the model change then all bets are off.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        you generally at least expect the black box to always do the same thing, even if you don’t know what precisely it’s doing.