Well, there are things called upvotes and downvotes. So yes I, as an individual, have that opinion. But Greater Lemmy downvoted me and didn’t upvote me, so clearly the sentiment on Lemmy as a group is that Bill Clinton’s Epstein trips and sexual assaults are cool but Trump’s aren’t.
I have already explicitly told you I believe it because Lemmy is full of men who have no problem with rape, which is pretty fucking common.
Like your position is laughable - I’m unhappy as a woman regarding rape conversations, and I’m only getting downvoted because I’m not “smiling” enough in my comments. I’m sorry I have a bad attitude about rapists. I should really be nicer to them like you.
I have already explicitly told you I believe it because Lemmy is full of men who have no problem with rape, which is pretty fucking common.
Like your position is laughable - I’m unhappy as a woman regarding rape conversations, and I’m only getting downvoted because I’m not “smiling” enough in my comments. I’m sorry I have a bad attitude about rapists. I should really be nicer to them like you.
You’re getting downvoted because of your accusations which are batshit crazy, not because people disagree with you. Liberals don’t give a shit about what happens to Bill Clinton, progressives want him locked up and tankies want to execute him. No one is defending Bill Clinton here.
What people are saying is that there’s an election nearing its end, and the fate of Bill Clinton is right now completely irrelevant to this election, unlike Trump’s fate, because Trump is a man who is one of the two candidates, and Clinton isn’t.
If you then keep pointing out the existence of Bill Clinton multiple times, no one even understands what you’re arguing for. You want to persecute Bill? Okay, sounds good. How is this relevant to this election?
Lemmy is full of men who have no problem with rape, which is pretty fucking common.
That right there, that’s why you get my down-lemm. It’s a negative, sweeping generalization against the very platform you’re on and is sexist. I don’t feel it meaningfully contributes to the discussion.
Idk what you’re saying about the “Lemmy version” given that you’re entirely free to do so - in fact, you just did do so
Well, there are things called upvotes and downvotes. So yes I, as an individual, have that opinion. But Greater Lemmy downvoted me and didn’t upvote me, so clearly the sentiment on Lemmy as a group is that Bill Clinton’s Epstein trips and sexual assaults are cool but Trump’s aren’t.
Elsewhere in this same comment section:
That comment got 42 upvotes and 0 downvotes. I assume your downvotes have more to do with:
Lol quote the rest of that comment or link it because I don’t see it
https://discuss.online/comment/11989097
Or maybe you get downvoted for your general “woe is me”, “all of Lemmy is bad” attitude…
I have already explicitly told you I believe it because Lemmy is full of men who have no problem with rape, which is pretty fucking common.
Like your position is laughable - I’m unhappy as a woman regarding rape conversations, and I’m only getting downvoted because I’m not “smiling” enough in my comments. I’m sorry I have a bad attitude about rapists. I should really be nicer to them like you.
You’re getting downvoted because of your accusations which are batshit crazy, not because people disagree with you. Liberals don’t give a shit about what happens to Bill Clinton, progressives want him locked up and tankies want to execute him. No one is defending Bill Clinton here.
What people are saying is that there’s an election nearing its end, and the fate of Bill Clinton is right now completely irrelevant to this election, unlike Trump’s fate, because Trump is a man who is one of the two candidates, and Clinton isn’t.
If you then keep pointing out the existence of Bill Clinton multiple times, no one even understands what you’re arguing for. You want to persecute Bill? Okay, sounds good. How is this relevant to this election?
That right there, that’s why you get my down-lemm. It’s a negative, sweeping generalization against the very platform you’re on and is sexist. I don’t feel it meaningfully contributes to the discussion.