• orcaA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It was well known that the police disliked MOVE as a collective. That’s why they got slapped with a lawsuit by a federal judge for excessive force, illegal search and illegal seizure. They killed women and children with their plan because of their carelessness, and fired upon anyone that ran from the building they set on fire with their bombs.

      Your “citation” is cops and their interactions with black folk on the daily. I’m not gonna play this game where the opposition picks apart the irrelevant parts of a stance to try to weaken it.

      Edit: here’s your citation

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They killed women and children with their plan because of their carelessness

        So, it wasn’t intentional.

        Your “citation” is cops and their interactions with black folk on the daily

        So, cruelty, indifference, but not an actual desire to murder all of them?

        Edit: here’s your citation

        I can’t read that because it requires a subscription, but I very much doubt it says “the police plan was to kill everyone, and here’s the evidence for that”.

        • orcaA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If that wasn’t the intended plan with what they carried out, it was definitely a benefit based on the fact that police were already at odds with MOVE. So sure, no one sat at a table in a backroom and said “we’re going to kill them all” while cackling, but it was definitely not something they were opposed to based on their actions (which involved so much overreach and violation of rights that even the city and a federal judge couldn’t put a lid on it).

          The article talks about how all of the deaths involved in the MOVE shootout were eventually re-categorized as homicides instead of their initial categorization of “accidental”.

          After nearly four decades, Philadelphia has acknowledged that it was no accident when six adults and five children died in the MOVE bombing.

          The decision to amend the death certificates followed an independent investigation released this summer into how victims’ remains from the MOVE bombing languished in a cardboard box on a basement shelf at the Medical Examiner’s Office until 2021. The negligence led to widespread outrage and resignations. Reclassifying the deaths as homicides was among the recommendations in a 257-page report released in June that traced the office’s failures.

          It’s really not a stretch to think that the police didn’t want all of MOVE completely eliminated. They were unwilling to work with MOVE and MOVE was unwilling to bend to an organization that constantly violated the civil rights of the black community.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            the deaths involved in the MOVE shootout were eventually re-categorized as homicides

            Homicides? Do you mean first degree murder? Because to clear the bar you’re attempting to clear you need to prove that “The goal from the start was to kill everyone there”.

            • orcaA
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not going to keep arguing with a bad faith bootlicker.

              • merc@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                In other words, “I can’t defend my words, so I’ll ad-hominem the person who challenged them.”

                • orcaA
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I already did and it became obvious you were arguing in bad faith when you made an assumption about what a source said, despite not being able to actually even read it. You focused on the easiest thing to attack in the info I shared.

                  • merc@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    No you didn’t, you never came up with any evidence to prove your point. You came up with evidence they were malicious, cruel, etc. Not that there was a plan in place to kill them all and they executed that plan. That was your original claim, and nothing you’ve said backs it up.