Are the trolls other LLMs?

He looks like Uncle Rico

Appreciating the spectrum of human experience is GAY

Would be enough to get the rough texture in OPs picture, could add some apple as well as that’s a good source of Pectin for setting jams.

The books’s what?

No

Broadly correct but I like the ending in the novel better.

Always thought Survivor would make a great film too but the whole flying a plane into a skyscraper part kinda put the studios off.

What if I’m actually a set of traffic lights and the AI can’t work out what I am from my selfie?

For some interesting perspective on how much computing has evolved: the original iMac was released in 1998, 27 years ago. 27 years before that was 1971 and the brand new exciting machine then was the Kenbac-1, the world’s first personal computer.

Woken was first used in the 1930s to encourage black Americans and other minority groups to be aware of the prejudice and discrimination against them by white Americans.

It’s more like the term hadn’t become a catchall phrase for the right to dismiss all forms of injustice without having to engage with the actual issue.

The loss is the jobs lives we lost along the way.

Whoosh

And the rest of it is racism, not even disguised by metaphor.

The donut shop

No, you had it right the first time, they should in fact die.

I thought it was weird, thanks

Isn’t this a picture of the guy who owned Pollen, the company that scammed hundreds of millions of pounds from customers and paid for a dream wedding abroad costing millions while bouncing cheques to his staff?

I haven’t strawman’d them, they literally say China, Russia, Iran and DPRK are great and the West is bad continually. There’s no nuance to their position. At no point have I seen any post or comment from the OP that says “you know what, there’s some good and bad on both sides and maybe we should strive to find the balance in our perspectives” (though I will admit, I haven’t specifically gone through their post and comment history to seek it out).

It’s also not an ad hominem if I believe the person either doesn’t understand what they’re saying/doing or they’re intentionally saying/doing things because they’re themselves propagandised or being paid to say/do it.

Does that mean everyone should just believe every piece of “China is the greatest thing ever and nothing bad has or ever will happen here” as gospel truth?

Those sources boil down to DPRK state media and “some random person online who happens to agree with my POV”

Always funny how the most vehemently anti-propaganda people are the ones most hungry for their own form of propaganda.